The title of this piece is going to make a lot of Red Sox fans upset. As a passionate Sox fan myself, it isn’t exactly fun to write. The subject is being debated everywhere but the conclusion is often wrong. Much as we may not like it starting Jackie Bradley Jr. in Pawtucket would have been the right thing to do.
If he was sent down, it wasn’t going to be a permanent banishment to Pawtucket; he would have missed 9 games out of 162. He would miss a measly 5.5% of the 2013 season in exchange for his team control for 100% of the 2019 season. Even as tight of division race as everyone is predicting the AL East to be this year, what’s the impact of one hitter out of nine in the lineup over a sample size of nine games? That’s the question that, if quantifiable, answers the debate of what to do with Bradley. As a GM, Ben Cherington should be making the best BASEBALL decisions, not the best political decisions for these Sox. Stick around after the jump, and you’ll see just how little impact the Sox lose without Bradley for 9 games.

Jackie Bradley the Paw Sock, or Jackie Bradley the Red Sox? Which has a better ring to it?










